As part of their recent ceasefire agreement, India and Pakistan have experienced diplomatic disagreement over the role played by former U.S. President Donald Trump as mediator; Pakistan expressed appreciation to Trump while India disclaimed any outside involvement, emphasizing instead direct bilateral communications in reaching their ceasefire agreement. These differences of opinions led to public statements from both nations acknowledging them both publicly. (see The Times of India for example.)
On May 10, 2025, Trump posted on social media his news that India and Pakistan had agreed to an “immediate ceasefire,” crediting U.S.-led talks as the cause. He applauded both nations for taking this step while acknowledging his country’s role in brokering such an accord; Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif shared these sentiments by thanking Trump and acknowledging U.S. contribution towards it. @NickThornton_US
However, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri recently explained to a parliamentary committee briefing that the ceasefire agreement had been reached through bilateral talks between both nations’ DGMOs, and there had been no involvement by third-parties – in direct contradiction to Trump’s claims. The Times of India
Indian government policy has always favored bilateral solutions to issues with Pakistan without external mediation, as outlined by the Simla Agreement of 1972, which stresses direct talks between nations. Thus, India’s rejection of Trump’s mediation claims aligns with their historical approach to the Kashmir dispute and wider Indo-Pak relations.
Differing narratives have generated political discussion within India, prompting opposition parties to criticize the Modi administration for failing to officially refute Trump’s statements promptly and assess any implications they might have on India’s diplomatic autonomy. Congress leader Pawan Khera accused Modi’s administration of betraying national pride while demanding transparency regarding ceasefire talks.
Internationally, this situation has drawn global attention to the intricate geopolitics of South Asia. China has expressed willingness to engage both India and Pakistan towards regional stability. Meanwhile, other global actors have called for continued peace efforts.
As the ceasefire holds, India and Pakistan differing views regarding external mediation highlight the difficulties they are still grappling with in their bilateral relationship. This episode highlights both countries’ concerns over third-party involvement in Indo-Pak affairs as well as maintaining control of their diplomatic engagements.
Situation remains fluid, with future developments dependent on actions and communications from both countries. Observers continue to monitor closely as lasting peace requires delicate handling of historical tensions and mutual trust.